Conservation Reserve Program in Nebraska, 2020
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 12,051
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in Nebraska totaled $69,507,000 in in 2020.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 2020 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Dan L Morton | Winthrop, MN 55396 | $53,795 |
22 | Iowa Tribe Of Kansas And Nebraska | White Cloud, KS 66094 | $53,633 |
23 | Dwd Partnership | Clearwater, NE 68726 | $52,617 |
24 | Huppert Partnership | Salem, NE 68433 | $50,870 |
25 | Allan M Preston | Rosalie, NE 68055 | $50,354 |
26 | Exchange Bank ** | Gibbon, NE 68840 | $50,167 |
27 | Farm Credit Of Southern Colorado ** | Lamar, CO 81052 | $50,066 |
28 | Preston Farm & Cattle Inc | Lyman, NE 69352 | $50,000 |
29 | Rgm Corp | Potter, NE 69156 | $50,000 |
30 | Dinnel Green Valley Farm | Imperial, NE 69033 | $50,000 |
31 | Brozek And Sons Inc | Plainview, NE 68769 | $50,000 |
32 | Riddell Sales Inc | Dakota Dunes, SD 57049 | $50,000 |
33 | Krause Family Farms Inc | Plainview, NE 68769 | $50,000 |
34 | Ruth M Preston | Rosalie, NE 68055 | $50,000 |
35 | Blythe D Taylor | Wymore, NE 68466 | $50,000 |
36 | Dorothy Kaufman | Hawk Springs, WY 82217 | $50,000 |
37 | Sls LLC | Norfolk, NE 68701 | $50,000 |
38 | L & P Legacy Farms LLC | Milton, FL 32583 | $50,000 |
39 | Kahla Mathewson | Potter, NE 69156 | $50,000 |
40 | William-william Packer And Roma Jean Packer Revoca | Aurora, NE 68818 | $50,000 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”