Farm Subsidy information
Chase County, Nebraska
Total Subsidies in Chase County, Nebraska, 2020
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 565
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Chase County, Nebraska totaled $38,130,000 in in 2020.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2020 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Stromberger & Sons Partnership | Imperial, NE 69033 | $1,146,674 |
2 | K Cattle LLC | Imperial, NE 69033 | $1,108,731 |
3 | Frenchman Valley Ranch LLC | Imperial, NE 69033 | $771,273 |
4 | Triple Diamond Farms | Champion, NE 69023 | $626,903 |
5 | C & R Farms | Imperial, NE 69033 | $596,611 |
6 | Brad Foote | Imperial, NE 69033 | $556,164 |
7 | Dcn Farms Joint Venture | Imperial, NE 69033 | $553,830 |
8 | Stromberger Farms Inc | Imperial, NE 69033 | $548,720 |
9 | Bentz Valley Inc | Imperial, NE 69033 | $537,372 |
10 | Wine Glass Ranch Inc | Imperial, NE 69033 | $505,244 |
11 | Lloyd Wilson Jr | Imperial, NE 69033 | $502,163 |
12 | Linsey Foote | Imperial, NE 69033 | $500,000 |
13 | H E Strand & Sons | Wauneta, NE 69045 | $386,304 |
14 | Adams Bank And Trust ** | Ogallala, NE 69153 | $377,629 |
15 | Gregg & Denise Smith Jv | Imperial, NE 69033 | $369,062 |
16 | Tmm Farms Inc | Imperial, NE 69033 | $361,817 |
17 | Bussell Farms | Imperial, NE 69033 | $353,929 |
18 | Maddux Ranch Company | Imperial, NE 69033 | $343,700 |
19 | Tl Schilke Enterprises Inc | Lamar, NE 69023 | $342,505 |
20 | Hughes Family Farms Inc | Venango, NE 69168 | $333,955 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>