Farm Subsidy information
Cherry County, Nebraska
Total Subsidies in Cherry County, Nebraska, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 1,522
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Cherry County, Nebraska totaled $152,881,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Marty & Nancy Miller Partnership | Valentine, NE 69201 | $643,947 |
22 | Brush Creek Ranch LLC | Thedford, NE 69166 | $642,771 |
23 | Matthew Miles | Thedford, NE 69166 | $631,836 |
24 | Art Brownlee | Ashby, NE 69333 | $595,620 |
25 | Phipps Land And Livestock Inc | Whitman, NE 69366 | $577,884 |
26 | Jim Lee Ranch Limited Partnership | Valentine, NE 69201 | $577,748 |
27 | A B Cox | Mullen, NE 69152 | $571,899 |
28 | Cottonwood & Pine Ranch Ltd | Valentine, NE 69201 | $569,690 |
29 | Dean C Schied | Raymond, NE 68428 | $560,294 |
30 | Danny R Osburn | Wood Lake, NE 69221 | $550,267 |
31 | James A Hanna | Mullen, NE 69152 | $546,374 |
32 | Richard Minor Jr | Gordon, NE 69343 | $543,944 |
33 | John Mundorf Inc | Mullen, NE 69152 | $541,989 |
34 | Joe Mundorf | Wood Lake, NE 69221 | $537,972 |
35 | Carl Simmons | Valentine, NE 69201 | $537,287 |
36 | Steven D Koinzan | Valentine, NE 69201 | $535,383 |
37 | Phipps Cattle Co Inc | Whitman, NE 69366 | $534,319 |
38 | Tk Angus Co | Wood Lake, NE 69221 | $531,598 |
39 | Weber Enterprises Inc | Valentine, NE 69201 | $529,932 |
40 | Mike Henderson | Whitman, NE 69366 | $527,542 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”