Farm Subsidy information
Cheyenne County, Nebraska
Total Subsidies in Cheyenne County, Nebraska, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 3,821
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Cheyenne County, Nebraska totaled $365,386,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Miller Wht Farms Inc | Dalton, NE 69131 | $1,200,489 |
22 | Raymond Jessen Trust | Sidney, NE 69162 | $1,177,869 |
23 | Maas Farming Corporation | Potter, NE 69156 | $1,167,937 |
24 | Rick W Nelson Inc | Sidney, NE 69162 | $1,152,952 |
25 | Randal Miller | Sidney, NE 69162 | $1,149,280 |
26 | Raymond Kuehn | Sidney, NE 69162 | $1,131,531 |
27 | Morgan Farms Inc | Dalton, NE 69131 | $1,099,767 |
28 | Beyer Keil Wheatlands Inc | Sidney, NE 69162 | $1,096,402 |
29 | K & N Rexroth LLC | Sidney, NE 69162 | $1,036,902 |
30 | Wayne Frerichs | Lodgepole, NE 69149 | $1,011,737 |
31 | High Plains Farms Inc | Potter, NE 69156 | $1,011,192 |
32 | Dean R Hyde | Lodgepole, NE 69149 | $1,006,528 |
33 | Richard Stahl | Potter, NE 69156 | $976,416 |
34 | James B Ernest | Lodgepole, NE 69149 | $936,413 |
35 | T & K Enterprises Inc | Potter, NE 69156 | $932,231 |
36 | Roland Rushman | Gurley, NE 69141 | $931,175 |
37 | Ronan Framar Ltd. | Sidney, NE 69162 | $926,534 |
38 | Donald Sharman | Lodgepole, NE 69149 | $926,290 |
39 | Michael Jessen Revocable Trust | Sidney, NE 69162 | $905,928 |
40 | Bondegard Farms Inc | Lodgepole, NE 69149 | $903,828 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”