Livestock Indemnity Program (LIP) in Cuming County, Nebraska, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 85
Recipients of Livestock Indemnity Program (LIP) from farms in Cuming County, Nebraska totaled $861,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Livestock Indemnity Program (LIP) 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Herman Dinklage Inc | Wisner, NE 68791 | $130,055 |
2 | Nutritional Advances Inc | Lincoln, NE 68510 | $70,365 |
3 | Ritter Livestock LLC | Beemer, NE 68716 | $68,529 |
4 | Emmett D Gyhra Jr | Table Rock, NE 68447 | $64,793 |
5 | Ritter Feedyards LLC | Beemer, NE 68716 | $54,006 |
6 | J & P Livestock Llp | Napoleon, ND 58561 | $51,079 |
7 | Feller & Company | Wisner, NE 68791 | $37,336 |
8 | Steve Meister | West Point, NE 68788 | $28,028 |
9 | Kurt Brester | Dodge, NE 68633 | $22,154 |
10 | Roy Ritter | West Point, NE 68788 | $19,980 |
11 | David M Ulrich | West Point, NE 68788 | $17,005 |
12 | J & P Enterprises LLC | Napoleon, ND 58561 | $14,467 |
13 | Benjamin Christopher Meyer | Bernard, IA 52032 | $13,679 |
14 | Wade Petersen | Bancroft, NE 68004 | $12,531 |
15 | 2 Bitz Cattle Company LLC | Napoleon, ND 58561 | $12,323 |
16 | Jeremy W Ritter | Beemer, NE 68716 | $11,856 |
17 | Danley Doffin | Bancroft, NE 68004 | $11,736 |
18 | Kevin Rozeboom | Luverne, MN 56156 | $10,580 |
19 | Ronald Herman Ruskamp | Dodge, NE 68633 | $9,736 |
20 | Hayes Feeding Company LLC | Osceola, NE 68651 | $9,120 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>