Direct Payment Program in Custer County, Nebraska, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 1,716
Recipients of Direct Payment Program from farms in Custer County, Nebraska totaled $68,265,000 in from 1995-2021.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Direct Payment Program 1995-2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Tri-s Ag | Merna, NE 68856 | $1,856,934 |
| 2 | Safranek Irrigation | Merna, NE 68856 | $557,897 |
| 3 | Daake Farms | Merna, NE 68856 | $486,809 |
| 4 | Merna Valley Ag | Merna, NE 68856 | $479,006 |
| 5 | Adams Farm Partnership | Broken Bow, NE 68822 | $447,594 |
| 6 | Garry Lee Coleman | Broken Bow, NE 68822 | $443,209 |
| 7 | Pirnie Bros Investment Co | Broken Bow, NE 68822 | $434,902 |
| 8 | John Francis Beshaler | Arnold, NE 69120 | $415,002 |
| 9 | Mary Ellen Beshaler | Arnold, NE 69120 | $412,335 |
| 10 | Ross Land & Cattle LLC | Callaway, NE 68825 | $395,789 |
| 11 | Clarence Davenport Living Trust | Arnold, NE 69120 | $378,880 |
| 12 | Keith Leroy Carlson | Gothenburg, NE 69138 | $377,715 |
| 13 | Jodi Lynn Carlson | Gothenburg, NE 69138 | $377,715 |
| 14 | Bartak/bartak | Anselmo, NE 68813 | $370,449 |
| 15 | Circle B Agri Services Inc | Ansley, NE 68814 | $363,313 |
| 16 | Hostick Farms Inc | Merna, NE 68856 | $351,929 |
| 17 | Jimmy Joe Coleman | Broken Bow, NE 68822 | $348,765 |
| 18 | Deborah Lea Coleman | Broken Bow, NE 68822 | $348,725 |
| 19 | Conner & Conner Inc | Arnold, NE 69120 | $340,750 |
| 20 | Bartak Brothers Inc | Anselmo, NE 68813 | $338,824 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf