Farm Subsidy information
Hitchcock County, Nebraska
Total Subsidies in Hitchcock County, Nebraska, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 1,456
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Hitchcock County, Nebraska totaled $173,907,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Licht Farms | Palisade, NE 69040 | $1,479,784 |
2 | Rippen Inc | Culbertson, NE 69024 | $1,209,619 |
3 | Frank Joseph Stehno | Stratton, NE 69043 | $1,136,071 |
4 | Kristene Denise Mustion | Culbertson, NE 69024 | $996,863 |
5 | Warren E Schaffert | Trenton, NE 69044 | $994,703 |
6 | Steve Fries | Mccook, NE 69001 | $993,210 |
7 | Double A Farms Inc | Trenton, NE 69044 | $972,663 |
8 | Larry Dale Lashley | Trenton, NE 69044 | $951,231 |
9 | H V Farms Inc | Trenton, NE 69044 | $911,454 |
10 | Bruce - Bruce Hagan Hagan | Culbertson, NE 69024 | $910,490 |
11 | Jerry - Jerry A Must Alan Mustion | Culbertson, NE 69024 | $905,892 |
12 | Dennis Eugene Reiners | Trenton, NE 69044 | $873,125 |
13 | Loren Dale Cushing | Palisade, NE 69040 | $845,873 |
14 | Jeniene Marie Lashley | Trenton, NE 69044 | $833,411 |
15 | Baker Corp | Trenton, NE 69044 | $826,875 |
16 | Ted Rippen | Culbertson, NE 69024 | $823,827 |
17 | Don Hagan Jr | Phoenix, AZ 85085 | $812,070 |
18 | Francis Friehe | Culbertson, NE 69024 | $806,143 |
19 | Richard Cook | Culbertson, NE 69024 | $795,679 |
20 | Jacqueline Friehe | Culbertson, NE 69024 | $793,286 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>