Farm Subsidy information
Sherman County, Nebraska
Total Subsidies in Sherman County, Nebraska, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 1,436
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Sherman County, Nebraska totaled $178,842,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Fowler Farms Llp | Arcadia, NE 68815 | $829,915 |
22 | J Thomas Stanczyk Living Revocabl | Ashton, NE 68817 | $822,932 |
23 | Larry Siegel | Litchfield, NE 68852 | $822,867 |
24 | Jim D Rasmussen | Ravenna, NE 68869 | $822,635 |
25 | Thomas Edwin Bandur | Loup City, NE 68853 | $814,237 |
26 | Mark L Eurek | Loup City, NE 68853 | $759,529 |
27 | Daniel Thomas Stanczyk | Ashton, NE 68817 | $729,512 |
28 | Rodney Psota | Ravenna, NE 68869 | $694,808 |
29 | James Anthony Stanczyk | Ashton, NE 68817 | $687,189 |
30 | Timothy Kyle Obermiller | Loup City, NE 68853 | $685,321 |
31 | Kohlscheen Farms | Pleasanton, NE 68866 | $671,897 |
32 | Rodney Alan Snow | Litchfield, NE 68852 | $659,381 |
33 | Sidney Anton Snow | Litchfield, NE 68852 | $658,167 |
34 | Dirk Unick | Hazard, NE 68844 | $650,944 |
35 | Gary R Eurek | Loup City, NE 68853 | $643,426 |
36 | Ronald Klimek | Loup City, NE 68853 | $642,156 |
37 | Lloyd Heil | Loup City, NE 68853 | $640,256 |
38 | Bochart Farms Inc | Rockville, NE 68871 | $640,043 |
39 | Joseph Leo Jonak | Elba, NE 68835 | $632,666 |
40 | Robert Allan Ksionzek | Ashton, NE 68817 | $630,092 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”