Farm Subsidy information
Washoe County, Nevada
Total Subsidies in Washoe County, Nevada, 2019
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 48
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Washoe County, Nevada totaled $2,629,000 in in 2019.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Robert D Howell | Washoe Valley, NV 89704 | $77,730 |
| 2 | Julian Smith Jr | Carson City, NV 89704 | $30,221 |
| 3 | Capurro, Michael & Steven Dba Zz-30 Ranch LLC | Sparks, NV 89432 | $28,587 |
| 4 | John Espil Sheep Co Inc | Sparks, NV 89436 | $27,202 |
| 5 | Will J Cockrell | Cedarville, CA 96104 | $24,050 |
| 6 | Pacific Livestock Inc | Davis, CA 95617 | $20,363 |
| 7 | Estill Ranches LLC | Gerlach, NV 89412 | $19,466 |
| 8 | John Guerrero | Wadsworth, NV 89442 | $17,784 |
| 9 | Grove Brothers | Eagleville, CA 96110 | $16,745 |
| 10 | The Great Basin Institute | Reno, NV 89511 | $14,226 |
| 11 | Stephen James | Wadsworth, NV 89442 | $11,413 |
| 12 | Estill Ranches Sheep Co LLC | Gerlach, NV 89412 | $8,499 |
| 13 | Robert & Debra Depaoli | Lovelock, NV 89419 | $8,249 |
| 14 | Cliff Brothers Ranch LLC | Carson City, NV 89704 | $7,531 |
| 15 | Edward Evans | Washoe Valley, NV 89704 | $7,531 |
| 16 | Laird R Davis | Carson City, NV 89704 | $7,531 |
| 17 | Timothy Reed Martinez | Cedarville, CA 96104 | $5,761 |
| 18 | Fee Ranch Inc | Fort Bidwell, CA 96112 | $5,135 |
| 19 | Archie Osborne | Eagleville, CA 96110 | $5,103 |
| 20 | Kathy L Ferguson | Cottonwood, CA 96022 | $5,079 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf