Farm Subsidy information
Hillsborough County, New Hampshire
Total Subsidies in Hillsborough County, New Hampshire, 2020
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 36
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Hillsborough County, New Hampshire totaled $988,000 in in 2020.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Brookdale Fruit Farm Inc | Hollis, NH 03049 | $454,949 |
| 2 | Fitch Farm LLC | Milford, NH 03055 | $82,990 |
| 3 | Lavoies Farm LLC | Hollis, NH 03049 | $78,432 |
| 4 | Benjamin Fisk | Temple, NH 03084 | $54,993 |
| 5 | Pomeroy Farm | Mont Vernon, NH 03057 | $47,788 |
| 6 | Barrett Hill Farm LLC | Mason, NH 03048 | $29,456 |
| 7 | Normanton Farms LLC | Litchfield, NH 03052 | $25,678 |
| 8 | Farm Services Agency ** | Washington, DC 20250 | $23,326 |
| 9 | Mitchel M Filson | Weare, NH 03281 | $18,813 |
| 10 | Wayne N Colsia | Lyndeborough, NH 03082 | $14,619 |
| 11 | Mark R Anderson | New Boston, NH 03070 | $12,197 |
| 12 | Ara Lynn | New Ipswich, NH 03071 | $7,996 |
| 13 | The Ilsley Farm | Weare, NH 03281 | $5,978 |
| 14 | Good Earth Farm | Weare, NH 03281 | $5,728 |
| 15 | Mark A Salisbury | Temple, NH 03084 | $5,116 |
| 16 | Jennifer Connolly | Temple, NH 03084 | $4,125 |
| 17 | Mandy Bator | New Ipswich, NH 03071 | $3,495 |
| 18 | Claude Raymond | Weare, NH 03281 | $3,310 |
| 19 | Benedikt Dairy LLC | Goffstown, NH 03045 | $3,191 |
| 20 | Connolly Brothers Dairy Farm LLC | Temple, NH 03084 | $2,501 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf