Environmental Quality Incentives Program in Rockingham County, New Hampshire, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 23
Recipients of Environmental Quality Incentives Program from farms in Rockingham County, New Hampshire totaled $175,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Environmental Quality Incentives Program 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Daniel Briggs | Deerfield, NH 03037 | $29,260 |
2 | Arthur Jenks | Raymond, NH 03077 | $24,181 |
3 | Heath Batchelder | Nottingham, NH 03290 | $21,443 |
4 | Stuart Farm LLC | Stratham, NH 03885 | $20,904 |
5 | The Smith Great Bay Farm | Greenland, NH 03840 | $13,298 |
6 | James Fernald | Nottingham, NH 03290 | $9,330 |
7 | Sunnycrest Farm, Inc | Londonderry, NH 03053 | $6,788 |
8 | Moose Hill Orchards | Londonderry, NH 03053 | $6,704 |
9 | Daniel S Davis | Exeter, NH 03833 | $6,017 |
10 | Mark Tepper | Londonderry, NH 03053 | $5,599 |
11 | June Davis | Exeter, NH 03833 | $5,277 |
12 | Cameron Sewall | Stratham, NH 03885 | $4,832 |
13 | Karen J Johnson Spencer | Raymond, NH 03077 | $3,863 |
14 | Patti & Ray Bateman | Nottingham, NH 03290 | $3,500 |
15 | Phillips Exeter Academy | Exeter, NH 03833 | $3,000 |
16 | Philip Ferdinando | Derry, NH 03038 | $2,800 |
17 | Applecrest Farm Orchards Inc | Hampton Falls, NH 03844 | $2,550 |
18 | Johnson's Highland View Farm LLC | Windham, NH 03087 | $1,680 |
19 | Philip Primack | Epping, NH 03042 | $1,170 |
20 | John R Shaw | Hampton Falls, NH 03844 | $1,045 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>