Market Loss Assistance Program in New Jersey, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 1,049
Recipients of Market Loss Assistance Program from farms in New Jersey totaled $11,928,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Loss Assistance Program 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Rustin Farms | West Windsor, NJ 08550 | $136,816 |
2 | Wellacrest Farms Inc | Mullica Hill, NJ 08062 | $121,444 |
3 | Robert A Santini | Phillipsburg, NJ 08865 | $121,176 |
4 | H & S Dubois | Pittsgrove, NJ 08318 | $118,853 |
5 | Good Farms Inc | Southampton, NJ 08088 | $117,768 |
6 | S R Conard & Sons | Hillsborough, NJ 08844 | $115,119 |
7 | Durr Farms Inc | Bordentown, NJ 08505 | $113,019 |
8 | Roger A Woolf | Washington, NJ 07882 | $105,184 |
9 | Fred Fulper &/or Robert Fulper II | Lambertville, NJ 08530 | $101,772 |
10 | Farmdale Farm LLC | West Windsor, NJ 08550 | $100,340 |
11 | Kocsis Brothers | Baptistown, NJ 08803 | $95,184 |
12 | Myerwood Farms | Pilesgrove, NJ 08098 | $94,420 |
13 | Skeba Farms Inc | Monroe Township, NJ 08831 | $94,366 |
14 | Garrison Bros | Phillipsburg, NJ 08865 | $89,180 |
15 | Steven Zamek | Hillsborough, NJ 08844 | $89,135 |
16 | Sunnyside Dairies Inc | Mount Holly, NJ 08060 | $86,313 |
17 | Richard N Norz | Hillsborough, NJ 08844 | $77,630 |
18 | Hw Bibus & Son Inc | Chesterfield, NJ 08515 | $76,452 |
19 | Floyd Menchek | Ringoes, NJ 08551 | $71,666 |
20 | Christopher Bowne Pettit | Dover, MN 55929 | $68,728 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>