Environmental Quality Incentives Program in New Mexico, 1995-2021

Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 2,062

Recipients of Environmental Quality Incentives Program from farms in New Mexico totaled $25,427,000 in from 1995-2021.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Environmental Quality Incentives Program
1995-2021
1Jicarilla Apache TribeDulce, NM 87528$570,346
2Santa Clara PuebloEspanola, NM 87532$249,918
3Kirk ZachekOzona, TX 76943$197,243
4Allen AkersColumbus, NM 88029$197,242
5Joe And Geraldine BurfordTexico, NM 88135$171,294
6Mescalero Apache Cattle GrsMescalero, NM 88340$161,257
7Demaio Farms And Ranches IncClovis, NM 88101$160,280
8Frank H And Marcella BlackburnClovis, NM 88101$147,654
9Mesa Verde Ranch LlpAlamogordo, NM 88311$142,322
10Tangle Cross TrustDeming, NM 88031$140,542
11Martin Woods Dba Gone Organic DaiHico, TX 76457$135,925
12Charles A HafdellFort Sumner, NM 88119$135,731
13Gerald D MathisElida, NM 88116$134,773
14NapiFarmington, NM 87499$128,800
15Margarito TrujilloCimarron, NM 87714$119,248
16Cibola Ranch IncFort Sumner, NM 88119$113,359
17Pete DegrootRoswell, NM 88203$108,725
18Lockmiller FarmsClovis, NM 88101$103,893
19James A & Carolyn R Geiler Revocable TrustBlanco, TX 78606$103,030
20Oasis Dairy Farms IncRoswell, NM 88203$101,820

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag