Total Commodity Programs in Cibola County, New Mexico, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 189
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Cibola County, New Mexico totaled $2,986,000 in from 1995-2021.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 1995-2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | M And R Teamroping Productions LLC | San Fidel, NM 87049 | $987,105 |
| 2 | Fernandez Company Dba Floyd Lee Ranches | San Mateo, NM 87020 | $553,448 |
| 3 | Mt. Taylor Machine LLC | Milan, NM 87021 | $272,000 |
| 4 | Acoma Business Enterprises Dba Acoma Land And Catt | Pueblo Of Acoma, NM 87034 | $244,352 |
| 5 | Danny Mirabal | Grants, NM 87020 | $81,402 |
| 6 | Sedillo Cattle Association | New Laguna, NM 87038 | $79,552 |
| 7 | Dough Mountain Grazing Association | Old Laguna, NM 87026 | $62,735 |
| 8 | Raymond Gonzales | Seboyeta, NM 87014 | $48,341 |
| 9 | Cerro Verde Ranch | Gatesville, TX 76528 | $39,922 |
| 10 | Carl Elkins | Milan, NM 87021 | $29,913 |
| 11 | Cross 5 Ranch | Valley City, ND 58072 | $25,335 |
| 12 | Wes M Wengert | Bluewater, NM 87005 | $22,503 |
| 13 | Irvin Pablo | Grants, NM 87020 | $19,140 |
| 14 | Jodan S Mirabal | Grants, NM 87020 | $18,694 |
| 15 | Lucero Brothers Ranch | Peralta, NM 87042 | $15,260 |
| 16 | Acoma Cattle Growers Association | Acoma, NM 87034 | $13,948 |
| 17 | Robert C Analla | Casa Blanca, NM 87007 | $13,509 |
| 18 | Nielson Family Limited Partnership No 1 | Mesa, AZ 85204 | $13,467 |
| 19 | Frank Waconda | Casa Blanca, NM 87007 | $13,129 |
| 20 | Charles E Mallery | Ramah, NM 87321 | $12,550 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf