Total Conservation Programs in Santa Fe County, New Mexico, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 81
Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in Santa Fe County, New Mexico totaled $1,067,000 in from 1995-2021.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Conservation Programs 1995-2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | King Land & Cattle Co | Stanley, NM 87056 | $269,655 |
| 2 | Broken Arrow Ranch Ltd Co | Edgewood, NM 87015 | $127,096 |
| 3 | Tom C Horton Sr | Edgewood, NM 87015 | $117,061 |
| 4 | Pueblo Of Tesque Nobert Leno | Santa Fe, NM 87501 | $53,893 |
| 5 | Pine Canyon Ranch | Moriarty, NM 87035 | $48,092 |
| 6 | Anthony P Gonzales | Albuquerque, NM 87114 | $34,110 |
| 7 | Nambe Pueblo Tom F Talache Jr Gov | Santa Fe, NM 87506 | $26,502 |
| 8 | Rancho Las Lagunas Inc | Santa Fe, NM 87506 | $23,329 |
| 9 | Jack Bryan | Stanley, NM 87056 | $21,534 |
| 10 | King Brothers | Moriarty, NM 87035 | $20,198 |
| 11 | Lois Cavasos | Stanley, NM 87056 | $18,928 |
| 12 | Jim Rea | Edgewood, NM 87015 | $16,770 |
| 13 | Jose Longino Vigil | Santa Fe, NM 87506 | $15,648 |
| 14 | Roy Horton | Rio Rancho, NM 87144 | $12,440 |
| 15 | Reynaldo Romero | Santa Fe, NM 87507 | $12,099 |
| 16 | Alonzo S Gallegos | Pena Blanca, NM 87041 | $12,027 |
| 17 | Frank Romero | Santa Fe, NM 87506 | $11,403 |
| 18 | John Massengill | Santa Fe, NM 87506 | $11,109 |
| 19 | John F Wickersham | Santa Fe, NM 87501 | $10,857 |
| 20 | Susan Simons | Santa Fe, NM 87507 | $10,692 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf