Farm Subsidy information
Union County, New Mexico
Total Subsidies in Union County, New Mexico, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 1,051
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Union County, New Mexico totaled $133,363,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Durrett Farms | Amarillo, TX 79102 | $2,620,761 |
2 | Mason Farms | Dalhart, TX 79022 | $2,417,198 |
3 | 3-b Farms | Dalhart, TX 79022 | $1,872,705 |
4 | Todd And Honey Poling Jv | Clayton, NM 88415 | $1,737,136 |
5 | Dennis & Deana Shugart | Amarillo, TX 79124 | $1,588,955 |
6 | Meyers Farms | Texline, TX 79087 | $1,392,795 |
7 | Leslie Koehn | Sedan, NM 88436 | $1,380,227 |
8 | Barry L Poling Corporation | Texline, TX 79087 | $1,298,861 |
9 | Timothy L Morrow | Capulin, NM 88414 | $1,239,500 |
10 | Friendly Farms | Midland, TX 79705 | $1,169,160 |
11 | Atchley Incorporated | Des Moines, NM 88418 | $1,128,164 |
12 | Joe A Reeser | Clayton, NM 88415 | $1,035,953 |
13 | Podzemny Family Trust | Clayton, NM 88415 | $991,221 |
14 | Weldon M And Lillie J Newsom | Dalhart, TX 79022 | $965,530 |
15 | Stanley Unruh | Sedan, NM 88436 | $958,665 |
16 | George Todd Poling | Clayton, NM 88415 | $956,122 |
17 | Paul H Jesko | Sedan, NM 88436 | $904,016 |
18 | David H And Pamela J Newsom | Dalhart, TX 79022 | $901,753 |
19 | Y L Bar Ranch Ltd | Folsom, NM 88419 | $847,216 |
20 | Sierra Grande Cattle Co | Des Moines, NM 88418 | $790,744 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>