Farm Subsidy information
New York
Total Subsidies in New York, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 39,230
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in New York totaled $3,203,000,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Panek Farms | Albion, NY 14411 | $3,066,090 |
22 | Papas Dairy LLC | North Bangor, NY 12966 | $2,988,930 |
23 | Woodcrest Dairy LLC | Lisbon, NY 13658 | $2,949,219 |
24 | Spruce Haven Farm LLC | Union Springs, NY 13160 | $2,908,672 |
25 | Twin Birch Dairy LLC | Skaneateles, NY 13152 | $2,901,998 |
26 | Adirondack Farms LLC | Peru, NY 12972 | $2,865,522 |
27 | Wil-roc Farm | Kinderhook, NY 12106 | $2,858,862 |
28 | Kast Farms Inc | Albion, NY 14411 | $2,755,183 |
29 | R.l. Jeffres & Sons, Inc. | Wyoming, NY 14591 | $2,744,749 |
30 | Flevie And D Jean Danielewicz | Sanborn, NY 14132 | $2,725,059 |
31 | Gardeau Crest Farms, LLC | Perry, NY 14530 | $2,723,576 |
32 | Royal-j-acres LLC | Ogdensburg, NY 13669 | $2,722,572 |
33 | Offhaus Farms Inc | Batavia, NY 14020 | $2,667,517 |
34 | Aurora Ridge Dairy LLC | Aurora, NY 13026 | $2,628,828 |
35 | Sunny Knoll Farms Lp | Perry, NY 14530 | $2,622,624 |
36 | Mulligan Farm Inc | Avon, NY 14414 | $2,610,898 |
37 | Broughton Farm Operations LLC | Silver Springs, NY 14550 | $2,610,514 |
38 | Lo-nan Farms LLC | Pine Plains, NY 12567 | $2,586,763 |
39 | Agri-venture | Canastota, NY 13032 | $2,574,071 |
40 | Ashland Farm LLC | Aurora, NY 13026 | $2,572,620 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”