Farm Subsidy information
Cayuga County, New York
Total Subsidies in Cayuga County, New York, 2019
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 299
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Cayuga County, New York totaled $8,627,000 in in 2019.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Sunnyside Farms Inc | Scipio Center, NY 13147 | $305,115 |
| 2 | Du Mond Ag LLC | Union Springs, NY 13160 | $237,255 |
| 3 | Farm Services Agency ** | Washington, DC 20250 | $226,693 |
| 4 | Slobe Farms LLC | Red Creek, NY 13143 | $205,746 |
| 5 | Oakwood Dairy LLC | Auburn, NY 13021 | $199,355 |
| 6 | Cedar Creek Farms Inc | Hannibal, NY 13074 | $181,782 |
| 7 | Allen Farms LLC | Scipio Center, NY 13147 | $179,981 |
| 8 | Aurora Ridge Dairy LLC | Aurora, NY 13026 | $177,029 |
| 9 | Collier Farms LLC | Cato, NY 13033 | $158,289 |
| 10 | James Sierzenga | Auburn, NY 13021 | $151,099 |
| 11 | Ashland Farm LLC | Aurora, NY 13026 | $143,800 |
| 12 | Cayuga Dairy LLC | Genoa, NY 13071 | $133,751 |
| 13 | Daly Farms LLC | Cato, NY 13033 | $130,248 |
| 14 | Thomas Roach | Venice Center, NY 13147 | $117,325 |
| 15 | Vansridge Dairy LLC | Scipio Center, NY 13147 | $116,126 |
| 16 | Spruce Haven Farm LLC | Union Springs, NY 13160 | $107,709 |
| 17 | James Mahaney Jr | King Ferry, NY 13081 | $106,964 |
| 18 | Peters Dairy Farm Inc | Auburn, NY 13021 | $106,397 |
| 19 | Warne Farms Inc | Moravia, NY 13118 | $103,669 |
| 20 | Twin Birch Dairy LLC | Skaneateles, NY 13152 | $102,366 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf