Dairy Programs in Cayuga County, New York, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 291
Recipients of Dairy Programs from farms in Cayuga County, New York totaled $16,683,000 in from 1995-2021.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Dairy Programs 1995-2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Aurora Ridge Dairy LLC | Aurora, NY 13026 | $496,142 |
| 2 | Allen Farms LLC | Scipio Center, NY 13147 | $421,238 |
| 3 | Ka Vern Farms | Jordan, NY 13080 | $420,146 |
| 4 | Ashland Farm LLC | Aurora, NY 13026 | $380,453 |
| 5 | Scipio Springs Dairy | Union Springs, NY 13160 | $378,714 |
| 6 | Fessenden Dairy LLC | King Ferry, NY 13081 | $376,156 |
| 7 | Sunnyside Farms Inc | Scipio Center, NY 13147 | $363,868 |
| 8 | Elkendale Farm LLC | Locke, NY 13092 | $356,678 |
| 9 | Patterson Farms Inc | Auburn, NY 13021 | $351,470 |
| 10 | Ripley Farms LLC | Moravia, NY 13118 | $350,654 |
| 11 | Thomas Roach | Venice Center, NY 13147 | $301,439 |
| 12 | Ridgecrest Dairy LLC | Genoa, NY 13071 | $299,362 |
| 13 | Peters Dairy Farm Inc | Auburn, NY 13021 | $297,395 |
| 14 | Farm Services Agency ** | Washington, DC 20250 | $292,046 |
| 15 | Valley Mound Farms, LLC | Scipio Center, NY 13147 | $287,018 |
| 16 | Spruce Haven Farm LLC | Union Springs, NY 13160 | $265,033 |
| 17 | Dale L Mattoon | Locke, NY 13092 | $238,710 |
| 18 | Hatfield Farms LLC | Scipio Center, NY 13147 | $236,166 |
| 19 | Littlejohn Farms LLC | Union Springs, NY 13160 | $223,668 |
| 20 | Donald Doody | Auburn, NY 13021 | $213,788 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf