Counter Cyclical Program in Cayuga County, New York, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 392
Recipients of Counter Cyclical Program from farms in Cayuga County, New York totaled $3,648,000 in from 1995-2021.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Counter Cyclical Program 1995-2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Willet Dairy LLC | Locke, NY 13092 | $114,951 |
| 2 | O'hara Farms Inc | Auburn, NY 13021 | $103,870 |
| 3 | Venice View Dairy Inc | Scipio Center, NY 13147 | $96,054 |
| 4 | Enterprise Farms | Moravia, NY 13118 | $82,634 |
| 5 | James Sierzenga | Auburn, NY 13021 | $80,294 |
| 6 | Raymond Donald & Sons | Moravia, NY 13118 | $75,674 |
| 7 | Ww Patterson Inc | Auburn, NY 13021 | $72,262 |
| 8 | Allen Farms LLC | Scipio Center, NY 13147 | $65,588 |
| 9 | Turek Farms Partners LLC | King Ferry, NY 13081 | $56,462 |
| 10 | Denn-e-dale Farms LLC | Cato, NY 13033 | $55,222 |
| 11 | Slobe Farms LLC | Red Creek, NY 13143 | $54,698 |
| 12 | Dale C Parmley | Auburn, NY 13021 | $53,852 |
| 13 | Spruce Haven Farm LLC | Union Springs, NY 13160 | $51,540 |
| 14 | Cedar Creek Farms Inc | Hannibal, NY 13074 | $48,999 |
| 15 | Doody Farms LLC | Auburn, NY 13021 | $45,956 |
| 16 | John P Daly | Cato, NY 13033 | $43,552 |
| 17 | James Mahaney Jr | King Ferry, NY 13081 | $43,127 |
| 18 | Dugan Farms LLC | Aurora, NY 13026 | $42,364 |
| 19 | Gary D Gulliver | Union Springs, NY 13160 | $41,176 |
| 20 | Matthew J Hourigan | Elbridge, NY 13060 | $40,726 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf