Farm Subsidy information
Chenango County, New York
Total Subsidies in Chenango County, New York, 2019
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 211
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Chenango County, New York totaled $1,809,000 in in 2019.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Farm Services Agency ** | Washington, DC 20250 | $159,880 |
| 2 | Marshman Farms LLC | Oxford, NY 13830 | $65,840 |
| 3 | Cobar Dairy LLC | Mount Upton, NY 13809 | $64,436 |
| 4 | Johnson Farms LLC | New Berlin, NY 13411 | $60,068 |
| 5 | Indian Camp Farm LLC | Earlville, NY 13332 | $59,935 |
| 6 | Cheshire Valley Farms LLC | Oxford, NY 13830 | $40,728 |
| 7 | Postma Brothers LLC | New Berlin, NY 13411 | $38,259 |
| 8 | Balsam View Dairy Farm LLC | Mc Donough, NY 13801 | $36,610 |
| 9 | Happy Valley Farm | Sherburne, NY 13460 | $32,838 |
| 10 | Van Althuis Dairy LLC | Sherburne, NY 13460 | $31,101 |
| 11 | Hanehan Family Dairy - LLC | Saratoga Springs, NY 12866 | $26,014 |
| 12 | Roger Agren | Georgetown, NY 13072 | $25,657 |
| 13 | Underground Genetics LLC | Pitcher, NY 13136 | $23,515 |
| 14 | Joseph Warren | Greene, NY 13778 | $23,324 |
| 15 | Robert Frank | Oxford, NY 13830 | $22,044 |
| 16 | Mary Klecha Conroe | Greene, NY 13778 | $20,965 |
| 17 | Peter C Lathrop | Sherburne, NY 13460 | $20,797 |
| 18 | Carl Schwartz | Mc Donough, NY 13801 | $20,731 |
| 19 | John Kemmeren | Bainbridge, NY 13733 | $19,607 |
| 20 | Linckview Farms | De Ruyter, NY 13052 | $18,381 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf