Counter Cyclical Program in Clinton County, New York, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 161 to 180 of 222
Recipients of Counter Cyclical Program from farms in Clinton County, New York totaled $1,120,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Counter Cyclical Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
161 | Lisa Deno | West Chazy, NY 12992 | $718 |
162 | Harold D Jennette Jr | West Chazy, NY 12992 | $710 |
163 | Julie A Giroux | West Chazy, NY 12992 | $706 |
164 | Bryan Giroux | West Chazy, NY 12992 | $706 |
165 | Michael T Leclair | Churubusco, NY 12923 | $692 |
166 | Michael Rabideau | Mooers, NY 12958 | $624 |
167 | Jubert-castine Farm C/o Richard Castine Jr | West Chazy, NY 12992 | $610 |
168 | Peter J Sylvester | Ellenburg Center, NY 12934 | $603 |
169 | Anne M Sylvester | Ellenburg Center, NY 12934 | $603 |
170 | Simon Conroy | West Chazy, NY 12992 | $580 |
171 | Bruce Trombley | Ellenburg Center, NY 12934 | $564 |
172 | John E Duquette Sr | West Chazy, NY 12992 | $562 |
173 | Anthony Oliver | West Chazy, NY 12992 | $562 |
174 | Mae Lavarnway | Saranac, NY 12981 | $558 |
175 | Gilbert Rabideau | Mooers Forks, NY 12959 | $548 |
176 | Rolland Magoon | Ellenburg Center, NY 12934 | $543 |
177 | Walter Maliniak | West Chazy, NY 12992 | $511 |
178 | Arnold Beeman | Chazy, NY 12921 | $468 |
179 | Cashman Acres | Ellenburg Center, NY 12934 | $468 |
180 | Michael B Oliver | West Chazy, NY 12992 | $466 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”