Farm Subsidy information
Clinton County, New York
Total Subsidies in Clinton County, New York, 2019
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 125
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Clinton County, New York totaled $3,332,000 in in 2019.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2019 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Adirondack Farms LLC | Peru, NY 12972 | $187,198 |
2 | Rovers Dairy LLC | Chazy, NY 12921 | $184,398 |
3 | Farm Services Agency ** | Washington, DC 20250 | $171,803 |
4 | Bubbins Farm LLC | Plattsburgh, NY 12901 | $72,314 |
5 | Rovers Farm Inc | Chazy, NY 12921 | $64,886 |
6 | Carter Farms Inc | Plattsburgh, NY 12901 | $63,172 |
7 | Remillard Farms LLC | Peru, NY 12972 | $62,522 |
8 | Cha-liz Farm LLC | West Chazy, NY 12992 | $60,149 |
9 | Giroux's Poultry Farm Inc | Chazy, NY 12921 | $54,462 |
10 | Rusty Creek Farm LLC | Chazy, NY 12921 | $52,352 |
11 | Hidden View Farm LLC | Champlain, NY 12919 | $52,010 |
12 | Leduc's Green Acre Farm LLC | Champlain, NY 12919 | $51,057 |
13 | Giroux's Grain Farms LLC | Chazy, NY 12921 | $50,471 |
14 | Three L Farm | Ellenburg Depot, NY 12935 | $50,160 |
15 | William K Ashline | Plattsburgh, NY 12901 | $47,276 |
16 | The William H Miner Agricultural Research Institut | Chazy, NY 12921 | $45,742 |
17 | Dimock Farms LLC | Peru, NY 12972 | $43,657 |
18 | B & R Dairy Inc | Chazy, NY 12921 | $41,817 |
19 | Tony Robert Lamberton | Mooers Forks, NY 12959 | $38,350 |
20 | Harrigan Brothers Dairy Farm | Chateaugay, NY 12920 | $27,373 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>