Tree Assistance Program in Clinton County, New York, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 62
Recipients of Tree Assistance Program from farms in Clinton County, New York totaled $829,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Tree Assistance Program 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Chazy Orchards Inc | Chazy, NY 12921 | $95,085 |
2 | Sullivan Orchards Inc | Peru, NY 12972 | $70,054 |
3 | Parker Family Maple Farm | West Chazy, NY 12992 | $50,822 |
4 | Wayne Decoste Dba | Mooers Forks, NY 12959 | $45,587 |
5 | Alton Or Roger Sample Partnership | Mooers Forks, NY 12959 | $34,634 |
6 | Fox Hill Maple Dairy | Altona, NY 12910 | $33,750 |
7 | Albert Trombley | West Chazy, NY 12992 | $25,000 |
8 | Albert Dean | West Chazy, NY 12992 | $25,000 |
9 | Wayne Brow | West Chazy, NY 12992 | $25,000 |
10 | Richard Atwood | West Chazy, NY 12992 | $24,653 |
11 | Robert Atwood | West Chazy, NY 12992 | $24,653 |
12 | Everett Orchards Ltd | Peru, NY 12972 | $23,606 |
13 | Elwood Jennette | West Chazy, NY 12992 | $22,678 |
14 | Harold Rabideau - Dba | Mooers Forks, NY 12959 | $20,250 |
15 | Forrence Orchards Inc | Peru, NY 12972 | $19,739 |
16 | Albert Portal | Morrisonville, NY 12962 | $18,294 |
17 | James Rabideau | Mooers Forks, NY 12959 | $18,178 |
18 | Donna Rabideau | Mooers Forks, NY 12959 | $18,178 |
19 | Lamberton Farms | Mooers Forks, NY 12959 | $14,661 |
20 | Wayne Deno | West Chazy, NY 12992 | $13,499 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>