Dairy Programs in Franklin County, New York, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 416
Recipients of Dairy Programs from farms in Franklin County, New York totaled $13,673,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Dairy Programs 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Eugene M Poirier | North Bangor, NY 12966 | $140,469 |
22 | Jean Louis Choiniere | Malone, NY 12953 | $137,228 |
23 | Scott E Hamilton | Malone, NY 12953 | $129,848 |
24 | Frederick I Tuttle | North Bangor, NY 12966 | $124,674 |
25 | Keith Peterson | Burke, NY 12917 | $120,303 |
26 | Thomas Armstrong | Constable, NY 12926 | $118,864 |
27 | Roland Poirier | North Bangor, NY 12966 | $111,372 |
28 | Vincent & Trudy Bilow | Malone, NY 12953 | $109,333 |
29 | Burkeside Farm Inc | Burke, NY 12917 | $104,326 |
30 | William J Jones | Chateaugay, NY 12920 | $102,784 |
31 | Jimali Holsteins | North Bangor, NY 12966 | $102,130 |
32 | Gerald Magnan | Chateaugay, NY 12920 | $97,228 |
33 | Gerald T Oakes Jr | Bombay, NY 12914 | $90,536 |
34 | Allan Peck | Burke, NY 12917 | $88,422 |
35 | Allan Friend | Burke, NY 12917 | $87,225 |
36 | Gary P Monica | North Bangor, NY 12966 | $86,576 |
37 | Wood Dairy Farm | Chateaugay, NY 12920 | $85,680 |
38 | Woodworth Farms LLC | Constable, NY 12926 | $85,134 |
39 | Richard Van Lieu | Burke, NY 12917 | $82,695 |
40 | M David Stauffer | Brushton, NY 12916 | $80,921 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”