Loan Deficiency in Herkimer County, New York, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 247
Recipients of Loan Deficiency from farms in Herkimer County, New York totaled $1,479,000 in from 1995-2021.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Loan Deficiency 1995-2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Manor Farm II | Little Falls, NY 13365 | $77,855 |
| 2 | Robert Entwistle | Frankfort, NY 13340 | $49,145 |
| 3 | Livingston Farm | West Winfield, NY 13491 | $40,676 |
| 4 | Timmerman Farms | Little Falls, NY 13365 | $37,847 |
| 5 | Ronald Timmerman Sr | Little Falls, NY 13365 | $37,743 |
| 6 | Entwistle Bros Farm LLC | Frankfort, NY 13340 | $36,494 |
| 7 | Phillip Finster | Frankfort, NY 13340 | $36,251 |
| 8 | James Lipiec | Little Falls, NY 13365 | $32,286 |
| 9 | Wedgenock Farm | Ilion, NY 13357 | $29,030 |
| 10 | Richvalley Farms | Mohawk, NY 13407 | $28,824 |
| 11 | George Will | West Winfield, NY 13491 | $27,669 |
| 12 | Manino Brothers | Frankfort, NY 13340 | $24,170 |
| 13 | Charles G Petrie | Little Falls, NY 13365 | $23,353 |
| 14 | Leslie Nelson Crouss | Springfield Center, NY 13468 | $22,559 |
| 15 | Charles Fred Casler Jr | West Winfield, NY 13491 | $22,355 |
| 16 | Maypar Farm | West Winfield, NY 13491 | $21,431 |
| 17 | David Bladek | Little Falls, NY 13365 | $21,025 |
| 18 | Currier Bros | Clayville, NY 13322 | $20,094 |
| 19 | Mat Kay Farm | West Winfield, NY 13491 | $19,564 |
| 20 | Len-lo Farms Cattle, & Equipment LLC | Mohawk, NY 13407 | $19,182 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf