Farm Subsidy information
Montgomery County, New York
Total Subsidies in Montgomery County, New York, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 830
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Montgomery County, New York totaled $58,713,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Creek Acres Farm | Amsterdam, NY 12010 | $428,296 |
22 | Kerry L Stowell | Saint Johnsville, NY 13452 | $427,748 |
23 | Laverne Jones | Fonda, NY 12068 | $407,496 |
24 | Farm Services Agency ** | Washington, DC 20250 | $379,710 |
25 | Robert J Dygert | Palatine Bridge, NY 13428 | $377,866 |
26 | John R Schuyler | Fort Plain, NY 13339 | $372,706 |
27 | Karl Veit | Fort Plain, NY 13339 | $332,731 |
28 | Joseph F Korona | Fort Johnson, NY 12070 | $332,600 |
29 | Sievers Brothers | Amsterdam, NY 12010 | $316,935 |
30 | Benmar Farms Inc | Palatine Bridge, NY 13428 | $315,753 |
31 | John G Nellis | Fort Plain, NY 13339 | $303,509 |
32 | Jon A Klemme | Spearman, TX 79081 | $295,447 |
33 | John A Balbian III | Amsterdam, NY 12010 | $283,041 |
34 | John G Kellett Jr | Fort Plain, NY 13339 | $269,119 |
35 | Wayne Conard | Sharon Springs, NY 13459 | $263,704 |
36 | Shenandoah Farm | Fultonville, NY 12072 | $261,495 |
37 | Ed & Ron Young Farms | Palatine Bridge, NY 13428 | $258,916 |
38 | Michael Pank | Sprakers, NY 12166 | $253,479 |
39 | Clyde B Snyder | Saint Johnsville, NY 13452 | $252,616 |
40 | Donald Klemme II | Fort Plain, NY 13339 | $252,161 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”