Dairy Programs in Onondaga County, New York, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 233
Recipients of Dairy Programs from farms in Onondaga County, New York totaled $16,702,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Dairy Programs 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Elmer Richards & Sons LLC | Skaneateles, NY 13152 | $451,372 |
2 | Farm Services Agency ** | Washington, DC 20250 | $442,111 |
3 | Venture Farms LLC | Tully, NY 13159 | $423,306 |
4 | Michael Hourigan Family Dairy, LLC | Syracuse, NY 13215 | $420,819 |
5 | Co-vale Holsteins LLC | Preble, NY 13141 | $415,647 |
6 | William E Richards & Sons LLC | Skaneateles, NY 13152 | $415,409 |
7 | Eastview Farms LLC | Tully, NY 13159 | $408,278 |
8 | Twin Birch Dairy LLC | Skaneateles, NY 13152 | $393,117 |
9 | Frazee Farms, L.l.c. | Fabius, NY 13063 | $369,942 |
10 | Scholten Dairy Farm | Baldwinsville, NY 13027 | $369,888 |
11 | Maple Lane Farms Dairy & Grain, LLC | Marietta, NY 13110 | $351,927 |
12 | Fabius Greenwood Farm LLC | Tully, NY 13159 | $351,900 |
13 | Volles Dairy Farm LLC | Marietta, NY 13110 | $336,317 |
14 | Tre-g Farms, LLC | Manlius, NY 13104 | $332,523 |
15 | Fesko Dairy LLC | Skaneateles, NY 13152 | $304,819 |
16 | Snavlin Farms LLC | Tully, NY 13159 | $292,605 |
17 | Lawrence Doody & Sons LLC | Tully, NY 13159 | $287,097 |
18 | Marshfield Farms LLC | Marcellus, NY 13108 | $284,365 |
19 | Barbland Dairy LLC | Fabius, NY 13063 | $281,535 |
20 | Cowles Farms LLC | Marietta, NY 13110 | $271,762 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>