Farm Subsidy information
North Carolina
Total Subsidies in North Carolina, 2019
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 12,820
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in North Carolina totaled $510,104,000 in in 2019.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2019 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Southland Farms | Belhaven, NC 27810 | $638,320 |
22 | West Family Farms Partnership | Fremont, NC 27830 | $634,909 |
23 | Wf Partnership | Newton Grove, NC 28366 | $626,255 |
24 | Farless & Sons | Merry Hill, NC 27957 | $623,124 |
25 | Randy Darren Riggs | Pollocksville, NC 28573 | $605,473 |
26 | Thurman Burleson & Sons | Richfield, NC 28137 | $590,309 |
27 | Vick Family Farms Partnership | Wilson, NC 27896 | $569,617 |
28 | Walton Farms | Lumber Bridge, NC 28357 | $562,430 |
29 | Marion L Pridgen Farms Inc | Wilson, NC 27894 | $561,743 |
30 | Tyson Family Farms Inc | Nashville, NC 27856 | $559,631 |
31 | Tommy Castelow | Cofield, NC 27922 | $555,469 |
32 | D Jackson Farms LLC | Mount Olive, NC 28365 | $553,084 |
33 | Lewis Farms Partners | Hobbsville, NC 27946 | $550,907 |
34 | Roger Dean Oxendine | Rowland, NC 28383 | $539,331 |
35 | Amd Farms | Hobgood, NC 27843 | $537,552 |
36 | Bobby K Davis | Fairmont, NC 28340 | $536,869 |
37 | Rest-a-bit Farms | Pinetops, NC 27864 | $529,020 |
38 | John E Lancaster Farms | Elm City, NC 27822 | $527,159 |
39 | Tim Phelps Farms LLC | Gaston, NC 27832 | $521,579 |
40 | Felton Outland Farming | Sunbury, NC 27979 | $515,334 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”