Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program in North Carolina, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 2,994
Recipients of Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program from farms in North Carolina totaled $5,205,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Farm Services Agency ** | Washington, DC 20250 | $124,512 |
2 | Agrifund LLC ** | Amarillo, TX 79106 | $114,321 |
3 | 3 B Farms Partnership | Pinetown, NC 27865 | $51,844 |
4 | John E Lancaster Farms | Elm City, NC 27822 | $48,118 |
5 | Wilbur Daniel Ward | Clarkton, NC 28433 | $44,936 |
6 | French Farms | Vanceboro, NC 28586 | $39,578 |
7 | Williams Brothers Farm | Monroe, NC 28112 | $38,835 |
8 | Cape Fear Farm Credit Aca ** | Clinton, NC 28329 | $32,255 |
9 | Joyner Farms Inc | Aulander, NC 27805 | $31,830 |
10 | Robert A Moore | Currie, NC 28435 | $30,792 |
11 | Anderson Farms Jackie L Anderson Sr Della B Anders | Vanceboro, NC 28586 | $29,508 |
12 | Mcduffie Farms Usa LLC | Council, NC 28434 | $29,446 |
13 | Double R Farms Inc. | Whiteville, NC 28472 | $29,392 |
14 | Battleboro Ag Partnership | Battleboro, NC 27809 | $28,540 |
15 | Byrdfield Farms Inc | Clarkton, NC 28433 | $28,518 |
16 | Mark Turbeville | Chadbourn, NC 28431 | $28,269 |
17 | Arthur Farms Inc | New Bern, NC 28562 | $27,844 |
18 | Brentley R Watts | Clarendon, NC 28432 | $26,946 |
19 | Ben Shelton Farms | Macclesfield, NC 27852 | $26,575 |
20 | Danny Ray Sykes | Kinston, NC 28501 | $22,854 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>