Total Disaster Programs in North Carolina, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 38,453
Recipients of Total Disaster Programs from farms in North Carolina totaled $997,060,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Disaster Programs 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Bailey Brothers Farms | Bailey, NC 27807 | $6,726,490 |
2 | Dale Bone Farms Partnership | Wilson, NC 27896 | $5,607,499 |
3 | Fann Farms | Salemburg, NC 28385 | $2,720,327 |
4 | Whitehurst Farms Ptns | Conetoe, NC 27819 | $2,665,928 |
5 | Farm Services Agency ** | Washington, DC 20250 | $2,230,724 |
6 | Anderson Farms | Tarboro, NC 27886 | $2,122,851 |
7 | Malcolm Ray Wilson | Clinton, NC 28328 | $2,002,431 |
8 | Anthony C Smith Farms Partnership | Pink Hill, NC 28572 | $1,959,198 |
9 | James E Jr And Wanda H Howard | Deep Run, NC 28525 | $1,773,521 |
10 | James B Best | Newton Grove, NC 28366 | $1,739,334 |
11 | Lester Robbin Best | Clinton, NC 28328 | $1,739,333 |
12 | Charles Marvin Tart Sr | Dunn, NC 28334 | $1,665,058 |
13 | Howard Farms | Deep Run, NC 28525 | $1,553,487 |
14 | Keel Brothers Farms | Robersonville, NC 27871 | $1,525,087 |
15 | J Michael Hope | Clinton, NC 28328 | $1,524,807 |
16 | William J Hering Jr | Faison, NC 28341 | $1,508,193 |
17 | Sanderson & Son Farming | Kinston, NC 28501 | $1,322,586 |
18 | Vick Family Farms Partnership | Wilson, NC 27896 | $1,233,697 |
19 | Wf Partnership | Newton Grove, NC 28366 | $1,233,032 |
20 | Augustine Farm Inc | Hammonton, NJ 08037 | $1,214,938 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>