Wool and Mohair Programs in North Carolina, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 210
Recipients of Wool and Mohair Programs from farms in North Carolina totaled $103,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Wool and Mohair Programs 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Jackie Ball | Marshall, NC 28753 | $9,320 |
2 | Sue Ann Tallon Nissen | Marshall, NC 28753 | $6,386 |
3 | Roger Robinson | Mars Hill, NC 28754 | $5,672 |
4 | Judy H Carson | Barnardsville, NC 28709 | $4,568 |
5 | Stevie Rogers | Hot Springs, NC 28743 | $2,715 |
6 | George Martin Best | Clyde, NC 28721 | $2,260 |
7 | Joretta Parris | Clyde, NC 28721 | $2,233 |
8 | Environmental Diag Inc | Warrenton, NC 27589 | $1,995 |
9 | Anthony D Cole | Leicester, NC 28748 | $1,965 |
10 | Henry Rathbone | Clyde, NC 28721 | $1,855 |
11 | Terry E Bacon | Elkin, NC 28621 | $1,648 |
12 | Richard E Cooper | Leicester, NC 28748 | $1,431 |
13 | Chris Bruton | Halifax, NC 27839 | $1,346 |
14 | Joan Shuford | Mars Hill, NC 28754 | $1,343 |
15 | Elaine Stennett | Fletcher, NC 28732 | $1,272 |
16 | Douglas E West | Waynesville, NC 28786 | $1,241 |
17 | James H Coman III | Piney Creek, NC 28663 | $1,208 |
18 | James Hogue | Mars Hill, NC 28754 | $1,089 |
19 | Kristin Savage | Darlington, PA 16115 | $1,079 |
20 | Miriam Hearne | Leicester, NC 28748 | $1,061 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>