Market Loss Assistance Program in Chatham County, North Carolina, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 208
Recipients of Market Loss Assistance Program from farms in Chatham County, North Carolina totaled $640,000 in from 1995-2021.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Loss Assistance Program 1995-2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Darryle Lindley | Snow Camp, NC 27349 | $50,367 |
| 2 | Ronald G White | Siler City, NC 27344 | $35,971 |
| 3 | James Mike Lindley | Siler City, NC 27344 | $33,074 |
| 4 | J Lynn Mann | Pittsboro, NC 27312 | $33,072 |
| 5 | Charlie Bouldin Estate | Pittsboro, NC 27312 | $30,343 |
| 6 | Phillips Farms | Bear Creek, NC 27207 | $27,021 |
| 7 | Brooks Properties LLC | Siler City, NC 27344 | $26,226 |
| 8 | Billy Joe Thomas | Snow Camp, NC 27349 | $24,398 |
| 9 | Peggy Lindley | Snow Camp, NC 27349 | $23,939 |
| 10 | Councilman Farms | Bear Creek, NC 27207 | $23,299 |
| 11 | Strowd Bros Dairy | Pittsboro, NC 27312 | $22,374 |
| 12 | Billy Joe Gaddy | Snow Camp, NC 27349 | $22,141 |
| 13 | Jerry W Crawford | Chapel Hill, NC 27516 | $21,835 |
| 14 | Brush Creek Swiss Farm | Siler City, NC 27344 | $15,362 |
| 15 | Hoof Patter Farms/peggy Pugh | Pittsboro, NC 27312 | $9,576 |
| 16 | W Lee Cloer | Burlington, NC 27215 | $9,325 |
| 17 | R D Lee Farms Inc | Erwin, NC 28339 | $9,307 |
| 18 | Oak Grove Farms | Siler City, NC 27344 | $7,908 |
| 19 | James E Lee Jr | Moncure, NC 27559 | $7,581 |
| 20 | O Wayne Kelly | Sanford, NC 27330 | $7,023 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf