Cotton Ginning Program in Chowan County, North Carolina, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 49
Recipients of Cotton Ginning Program from farms in Chowan County, North Carolina totaled $642,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Cotton Ginning Program 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Dale & Bryant White | Edenton, NC 27932 | $14,668 |
22 | Robert E Jordan | Tyner, NC 27980 | $14,331 |
23 | James Bradley Ward | Tyner, NC 27980 | $13,608 |
24 | Harry L & J L Winslow | Belvidere, NC 27919 | $13,184 |
25 | Joel C Nixon Jr | Edenton, NC 27932 | $11,562 |
26 | J M Parrish & Son Inc | Edenton, NC 27932 | $11,525 |
27 | Fenton Towe Eure Iv | Edenton, NC 27932 | $11,523 |
28 | Ricky E Toppin | Edenton, NC 27932 | $9,867 |
29 | Willis Ray Byrum Jr | Edenton, NC 27932 | $9,155 |
30 | William A Jordan | Tyner, NC 27980 | $8,788 |
31 | Joseph V Parrish | Edenton, NC 27932 | $7,997 |
32 | Lester Ray Copeland | Tyner, NC 27980 | $7,975 |
33 | C & R Farms | Edenton, NC 27932 | $7,418 |
34 | Mark E Bunch | Edenton, NC 27932 | $6,753 |
35 | Crossroads Farm Supply Inc | Tyner, NC 27980 | $6,400 |
36 | James E Jordan | Edenton, NC 27932 | $5,545 |
37 | Eure Farms LLC | Edenton, NC 27932 | $4,702 |
38 | Peele Brothers Inc | Edenton, NC 27932 | $3,770 |
39 | Cottonman Inc | Wake Forest, NC 27587 | $3,299 |
40 | Sydney P Copeland | Tyner, NC 27980 | $2,909 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”