Farm Subsidy information
Cleveland County, North Carolina
Total Subsidies in Cleveland County, North Carolina, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 1,762
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Cleveland County, North Carolina totaled $49,446,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Albert R Greene | Shelby, NC 28150 | $469,230 |
22 | Faith Farm Inc | Shelby, NC 28150 | $399,997 |
23 | M & M Produce Inc | Vale, NC 28168 | $383,908 |
24 | Matthew Curtis Bell | Kings Mountain, NC 28086 | $335,980 |
25 | Jack Neal Scism Jr | Kings Mountain, NC 28086 | $311,643 |
26 | Mitchem Farms LLC | Vale, NC 28168 | $296,723 |
27 | Andrew E Powell | Lawndale, NC 28090 | $291,383 |
28 | Jack N Scism | Kings Mountain, NC 28086 | $272,147 |
29 | Randall W Greene | Shelby, NC 28150 | $259,305 |
30 | A Franklin Harrill | Shelby, NC 28150 | $248,846 |
31 | Steven Reynolds Greene | Shelby, NC 28150 | $238,371 |
32 | Feliciano C Vargas | Lawndale, NC 28090 | $224,309 |
33 | Daves & Daves Farms | Shelby, NC 28150 | $219,676 |
34 | Joe D Costner & Son | Lawndale, NC 28090 | $219,647 |
35 | Elmore's Feed & Seed Inc | Lawndale, NC 28090 | $214,182 |
36 | George Gilbert Greene | Shelby, NC 28152 | $211,316 |
37 | Gary C Crotts | Shelby, NC 28152 | $203,692 |
38 | Glenn Sperling | Shelby, NC 28150 | $202,199 |
39 | William V Jackson Jr | Shelby, NC 28150 | $201,709 |
40 | Todd Callahan | Shelby, NC 28150 | $195,201 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”