Farm Subsidy information
Craven County, North Carolina
Total Subsidies in Craven County, North Carolina, 2019
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 163
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Craven County, North Carolina totaled $7,038,000 in in 2019.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2019 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | French Farms | Vanceboro, NC 28586 | $406,427 |
2 | Agrifund LLC ** | Amarillo, TX 79106 | $384,045 |
3 | Anderson Farms Jackie L Anderson Sr Della B Anders | Vanceboro, NC 28586 | $343,867 |
4 | R & W Mccoy Farms Inc | Cove City, NC 28523 | $208,033 |
5 | Fulcher Brothers Farm | Ernul, NC 28527 | $185,859 |
6 | Jason R Jones | Cove City, NC 28523 | $184,025 |
7 | William E Sutton Jr | Ernul, NC 28527 | $175,260 |
8 | David H Parker Farms Inc | New Bern, NC 28562 | $163,630 |
9 | Temple Farms Inc | Newport, NC 28570 | $155,935 |
10 | Wood Brothers Farm Inc | Cove City, NC 28523 | $151,913 |
11 | Dale Owens Dawson | Cove City, NC 28523 | $149,591 |
12 | Arthur Farms Inc | New Bern, NC 28562 | $132,327 |
13 | J-1 Enterprises Inc | Vanceboro, NC 28586 | $119,407 |
14 | Beech Grove Farms, LLC | New Bern, NC 28560 | $117,250 |
15 | Glen E Nobles | Vanceboro, NC 28586 | $111,103 |
16 | Charles Clayton Mitchell | Cove City, NC 28523 | $105,358 |
17 | Glen Allen Ipock | New Bern, NC 28562 | $96,513 |
18 | Robert Cowan | Ernul, NC 28527 | $93,083 |
19 | Charles Allen Mitchell | Cove City, NC 28523 | $92,963 |
20 | Thomas Dale Eborn | New Bern, NC 28560 | $92,786 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>