Counter Cyclical Program in Greene County, North Carolina, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 617
Recipients of Counter Cyclical Program from farms in Greene County, North Carolina totaled $10,591,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Counter Cyclical Program 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | W E Sugg III & Thomas A Sugg Part | Snow Hill, NC 28580 | $436,948 |
2 | L A Moye Farms | Maury, NC 28554 | $401,464 |
3 | Appletree Farms | Stantonsburg, NC 27883 | $398,020 |
4 | Lucky Four Farms Inc | Stantonsburg, NC 27883 | $267,802 |
5 | Mill Run Farms LLC | Snow Hill, NC 28580 | $255,726 |
6 | Dewitt Carroll Jones | Hookerton, NC 28538 | $252,076 |
7 | Hill Brothers Farms Inc | Snow Hill, NC 28580 | $222,245 |
8 | Triple M Farms Inc | Hookerton, NC 28538 | $219,356 |
9 | Ham Farms LLC | Snow Hill, NC 28580 | $217,583 |
10 | Clayridge Farms Inc | Snow Hill, NC 28580 | $209,028 |
11 | Gay Farms Inc | Walstonburg, NC 27888 | $185,049 |
12 | Michael E Hill | Kinston, NC 28501 | $179,147 |
13 | Dennis Ray Wood | Hookerton, NC 28538 | $169,426 |
14 | Clifton L Creech | Snow Hill, NC 28580 | $168,868 |
15 | Arba Farms Inc | Snow Hill, NC 28580 | $163,675 |
16 | Roy S Jones | Walstonburg, NC 27888 | $147,009 |
17 | Joseph B Smith | Ayden, NC 28513 | $134,011 |
18 | Timothy C Wood | Hookerton, NC 28538 | $133,852 |
19 | Woody Allen Ham | Snow Hill, NC 28580 | $132,323 |
20 | Wood Farms Of Greene County Inc | Maury, NC 28554 | $131,376 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>