Farm Subsidy information
Halifax County, North Carolina
Total Subsidies in Halifax County, North Carolina, 2019
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 320
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Halifax County, North Carolina totaled $18,051,000 in in 2019.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2019 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Agrifund LLC ** | Amarillo, TX 79106 | $1,075,658 |
2 | Jrk Farms LLC | Scotland Neck, NC 27874 | $513,214 |
3 | Pike Family Farms Partnership | Littleton, NC 27850 | $427,047 |
4 | Buckhorn Farms | Scotland Neck, NC 27874 | $415,620 |
5 | James Inscoe | Littleton, NC 27850 | $409,220 |
6 | Latros Farms | Enfield, NC 27823 | $401,897 |
7 | Josey Farms | Scotland Neck, NC 27874 | $394,250 |
8 | Morell Jones Farms | Enfield, NC 27823 | $334,351 |
9 | Garner Family Farms | Roanoke Rapids, NC 27870 | $334,106 |
10 | Kl&z Farms LLC | Littleton, NC 27850 | $329,303 |
11 | Grant Staton Farms Inc | Scotland Neck, NC 27874 | $326,504 |
12 | Marcus G Roberson | Littleton, NC 27850 | $305,931 |
13 | A N Dickens Jr | Halifax, NC 27839 | $305,912 |
14 | Robert C Cooke | Littleton, NC 27850 | $302,154 |
15 | Charles D Hale | Scotland Neck, NC 27874 | $300,266 |
16 | Fleming Brothers Farms LLC | Halifax, NC 27839 | $290,840 |
17 | Frederick Dunn Jr | Enfield, NC 27823 | $277,387 |
18 | Fields Of Cotton LLC | Scotland Neck, NC 27874 | $270,649 |
19 | Jack H Winslow Fms Inc | Scotland Neck, NC 27874 | $266,455 |
20 | Hedgepeth Farms | Halifax, NC 27839 | $249,866 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>