Commodity Certificates in Hoke County, North Carolina, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 18 of 18
Recipients of Commodity Certificates from farms in Hoke County, North Carolina totaled $1,003,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Commodity Certificates 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Gold Hill Farms Inc | Laurel Hill, NC 28351 | $251,219 |
2 | Hendrix Farms | Raeford, NC 28376 | $144,350 |
3 | Rockdale Farms Inc | Laurel Hill, NC 28351 | $109,988 |
4 | Stonewall Farms Inc | Laurel Hill, NC 28351 | $109,789 |
5 | 3l Investment Corporation | Raeford, NC 28376 | $80,873 |
6 | Andrew L Gibson | Red Springs, NC 28377 | $63,527 |
7 | Truett J Buie | Red Springs, NC 28377 | $51,220 |
8 | Henry Hunter Forbis | Lumber Bridge, NC 28357 | $48,537 |
9 | Hendrix Livestock Inc | Raeford, NC 28376 | $41,625 |
10 | T B Upchurch Inc | Raeford, NC 28376 | $29,829 |
11 | James D Mcgougan Estate | Lumber Bridge, NC 28357 | $19,403 |
12 | Autry Farms LLC | Fayetteville, NC 28306 | $18,318 |
13 | Forbis Farms | Lumber Bridge, NC 28357 | $12,169 |
14 | J L Mcneill Family Farm | Southern Pines, NC 28387 | $10,406 |
15 | James W Mcgougan | Lumber Bridge, NC 28357 | $7,879 |
16 | Perry L Mcbryde | Raeford, NC 28376 | $2,300 |
17 | Roscoe Mccollum | Raeford, NC 28376 | $1,510 |
18 | Edens Farms | Red Springs, NC 28377 | $492 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”