Farm Subsidy information
Pitt County, North Carolina
Total Subsidies in Pitt County, North Carolina, 2019
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 325
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Pitt County, North Carolina totaled $13,474,000 in in 2019.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2019 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Worthington Farms Inc | Greenville, NC 27834 | $408,868 |
2 | Jack Allen Farms | Winterville, NC 28590 | $293,761 |
3 | W C Moore | Bethel, NC 27812 | $262,579 |
4 | Congleton Farms Inc | Stokes, NC 27884 | $261,521 |
5 | Stancill Farms Inc | Ayden, NC 28513 | $261,375 |
6 | Roland Lee Sanderson Jr | Grifton, NC 28530 | $238,068 |
7 | Tar River Grain LLC | Greenville, NC 27834 | $225,006 |
8 | L Tyson & Sons Inc | Ayden, NC 28513 | $211,924 |
9 | Dickie Mills Farms Inc | Ayden, NC 28513 | $206,571 |
10 | Brian Russell Edwards | Greenville, NC 27858 | $195,148 |
11 | S & S Farms Ptr | Farmville, NC 27828 | $186,288 |
12 | Agrarian Inc | Stantonsburg, NC 27883 | $185,794 |
13 | James & James Farms Inc | Stokes, NC 27884 | $177,157 |
14 | Rbm Farms LLC | Grifton, NC 28530 | $175,242 |
15 | Dick Mills Farms Inc | Ayden, NC 28513 | $138,230 |
16 | Briley & Briley Farms Inc | Stokes, NC 27884 | $132,616 |
17 | Farm Services Agency ** | Washington, DC 20250 | $132,199 |
18 | Charles E Tucker | Tarboro, NC 27886 | $130,163 |
19 | D Howard Nanney Jr | Farmville, NC 27828 | $128,115 |
20 | Frank Dail Farms Inc | Farmville, NC 27828 | $126,867 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>