Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program in Sampson County, North Carolina, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 687
Recipients of Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program from farms in Sampson County, North Carolina totaled $7,020,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Wf Partnership | Newton Grove, NC 28366 | $226,970 |
2 | Fann Farms | Salemburg, NC 28385 | $191,513 |
3 | Ronnie D Smith | Clinton, NC 28328 | $111,292 |
4 | Triple M Incorporated | Clinton, NC 28328 | $102,278 |
5 | Craven L Register | Clinton, NC 28328 | $101,873 |
6 | Carr Farms | Clinton, NC 28328 | $95,782 |
7 | M & A Farms Inc | Clinton, NC 28328 | $94,230 |
8 | Hollingsworth Farms Inc | Salemburg, NC 28385 | $87,197 |
9 | John Hope | Clinton, NC 28328 | $87,095 |
10 | Strickland Farming Partnership | Mount Olive, NC 28365 | $81,608 |
11 | Lucas Farms | Turkey, NC 28393 | $78,734 |
12 | Darden Family Farms Inc | Clinton, NC 28328 | $78,413 |
13 | James L Hope | Clinton, NC 28328 | $72,856 |
14 | Ten Mile Farm Inc | Faison, NC 28341 | $70,500 |
15 | Blue View Inc | Dunn, NC 28335 | $70,274 |
16 | Andy Pope Farms Inc | Clinton, NC 28328 | $68,116 |
17 | H & D Farms Inc | Autryville, NC 28318 | $67,678 |
18 | Larry Naylor Farms Inc | Clinton, NC 28328 | $65,514 |
19 | Miles Floyd Jackson | Dunn, NC 28334 | $64,287 |
20 | James Hurbie Faircloth Partnership F & W Farm | Roseboro, NC 28382 | $61,147 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>