Market Facilitation Program (MFP) in Stanly County, North Carolina, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 376
Recipients of Market Facilitation Program (MFP) from farms in Stanly County, North Carolina totaled $5,956,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Facilitation Program (MFP) 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Thurman Burleson & Sons | Richfield, NC 28137 | $536,045 |
2 | Herlocker Farms Inc | Albemarle, NC 28001 | $278,647 |
3 | Huneycutt Pig Farm | Albemarle, NC 28001 | $244,031 |
4 | Kevin Devon Baucom | Marshville, NC 28103 | $225,271 |
5 | David A Underwood | Albemarle, NC 28001 | $217,219 |
6 | Dogwood Farms Nc LLC | Albemarle, NC 28001 | $204,863 |
7 | C E Mcswain And Sons Inc | Norwood, NC 28128 | $204,655 |
8 | Timothy D Parker | Albemarle, NC 28001 | $196,784 |
9 | Long Creek Farms Inc | New London, NC 28127 | $181,556 |
10 | Sunnybrook Farm Inc | Richfield, NC 28137 | $175,106 |
11 | Barry Evans Mcswain | Norwood, NC 28128 | $166,043 |
12 | Lee's Farm | Oakboro, NC 28129 | $157,879 |
13 | Larry Coley | Norwood, NC 28128 | $131,972 |
14 | Darrell L Whitley | Locust, NC 28097 | $131,815 |
15 | River Island Inc | Monroe, NC 28110 | $127,649 |
16 | Bruce L Furr | Albemarle, NC 28001 | $122,159 |
17 | Bryan Allen Burleson | Albemarle, NC 28001 | $121,641 |
18 | Lonnie J Dennis II | Norwood, NC 28128 | $119,868 |
19 | Big Bear Creek Farms Inc | Albemarle, NC 28001 | $118,950 |
20 | Landon D Bunting | Mount Pleasant, NC 28124 | $118,798 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>