Price Loss Coverage Program (PLC) in Wilson County, North Carolina, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 214
Recipients of Price Loss Coverage Program (PLC) from farms in Wilson County, North Carolina totaled $5,224,000 in from 1995-2021.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Price Loss Coverage Program (PLC) 1995-2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | R J Hinnant & Sons Farms | Kenly, NC 27542 | $546,509 |
| 2 | Lancaster Properties | Stantonsburg, NC 27883 | $432,326 |
| 3 | Rock Ridge Farm Partnership | Wilson, NC 27893 | $397,210 |
| 4 | Vick Family Farms Partnership | Wilson, NC 27896 | $245,332 |
| 5 | Gerald Tyner Jr Farms Inc | Elm City, NC 27822 | $230,629 |
| 6 | Agcarolina Farm Credit ** | Elizabeth City, NC 27906 | $194,753 |
| 7 | Marion L Pridgen Farms Inc | Wilson, NC 27894 | $187,195 |
| 8 | Tyner Farms Partners | Elm City, NC 27822 | $181,589 |
| 9 | Scott Farms Inc | Lucama, NC 27851 | $167,864 |
| 10 | R B Lancaster & Sons Inc | Stantonsburg, NC 27883 | $141,037 |
| 11 | Sullivan Farms Inc | Lucama, NC 27851 | $140,173 |
| 12 | Bass Family Farms LLC | Lucama, NC 27851 | $116,986 |
| 13 | Sharp Farms Inc | Sims, NC 27880 | $100,396 |
| 14 | Williford Sons LLC | Elm City, NC 27822 | $98,236 |
| 15 | Donnie Tyner Farms Inc | Elm City, NC 27822 | $88,640 |
| 16 | Richard A Aycock Farms Inc | Stantonsburg, NC 27883 | $86,208 |
| 17 | David Bunting & Sons Inc | Elm City, NC 27822 | $85,234 |
| 18 | Todd Glover Farms Inc | Wilson, NC 27896 | $82,854 |
| 19 | Agrarian Inc | Stantonsburg, NC 27883 | $80,441 |
| 20 | B F Glover Farms LLC | Elm City, NC 27822 | $79,917 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf