Total Commodity Programs in Wilson County, North Carolina, 2019
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 197
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Wilson County, North Carolina totaled $6,251,000 in in 2019.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 2019 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Lancaster Properties | Stantonsburg, NC 27883 | $543,862 |
2 | Scott Farms Inc | Lucama, NC 27851 | $451,880 |
3 | Rock Ridge Farm Partnership | Wilson, NC 27893 | $393,171 |
4 | Marion L Pridgen Farms Inc | Wilson, NC 27894 | $321,955 |
5 | Vick Family Farms Partnership | Wilson, NC 27896 | $258,020 |
6 | R J Hinnant & Sons Farms | Kenly, NC 27542 | $222,072 |
7 | Webb Family Farms LLC | Stantonsburg, NC 27883 | $210,744 |
8 | Hocutt Farms Inc | Sims, NC 27880 | $209,975 |
9 | Sharp Farms Inc | Sims, NC 27880 | $192,062 |
10 | Jeff Barnes LLC | Lucama, NC 27851 | $161,026 |
11 | Bass Family Farms LLC | Lucama, NC 27851 | $153,954 |
12 | Richard A Aycock Farms Inc | Stantonsburg, NC 27883 | $153,954 |
13 | Williford Sons LLC | Elm City, NC 27822 | $152,586 |
14 | David Blalock Farms LLC | Wilson, NC 27893 | $145,341 |
15 | Sullivan Farms Inc | Lucama, NC 27851 | $142,735 |
16 | Scott Brothers Inc | Lucama, NC 27851 | $124,644 |
17 | William A Gardner | Stantonsburg, NC 27883 | $113,795 |
18 | Batts Farms | Elm City, NC 27822 | $111,603 |
19 | Lamm Farms | Sims, NC 27880 | $100,057 |
20 | Tyner Farms Partners | Elm City, NC 27822 | $98,411 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>