Farm Subsidy information
Benson County, North Dakota
Total Subsidies in Benson County, North Dakota, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 2,195
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Benson County, North Dakota totaled $575,869,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Rice Land & Cattle Co | Maddock, ND 58348 | $1,688,669 |
22 | Dennis Kurtz | Saint Michael, ND 58370 | $1,676,020 |
23 | Bryan Curtis Kenner | Maddock, ND 58348 | $1,675,991 |
24 | Bill Michael Streifel | Oberon, ND 58357 | $1,642,252 |
25 | Travis Lee Anderson | Warwick, ND 58381 | $1,587,476 |
26 | David Harold Kenner | Maddock, ND 58348 | $1,555,725 |
27 | Herman & Sons Inc | Minnewaukan, ND 58351 | $1,554,474 |
28 | Richard James Slater | Maddock, ND 58348 | $1,543,784 |
29 | Paul Tufte Jr | York, ND 58386 | $1,539,269 |
30 | Lorin Lee Haagenson | Leeds, ND 58346 | $1,520,263 |
31 | Douglas Dulmage | Leeds, ND 58346 | $1,516,927 |
32 | Brenda Lee Pfeifer | Minnewaukan, ND 58351 | $1,505,732 |
33 | David Gary Sears | Minnewaukan, ND 58351 | $1,492,563 |
34 | Jorgenson Farms, II | Leeds, ND 58346 | $1,481,799 |
35 | Lowell Baustad | Rugby, ND 58368 | $1,476,540 |
36 | Raymond Buckmier | Devils Lake, ND 58301 | $1,442,785 |
37 | Lyndon Olson | Maddock, ND 58348 | $1,417,660 |
38 | James D Arnold | Esmond, ND 58332 | $1,403,610 |
39 | Edwin T Gilderhus | Oberon, ND 58357 | $1,385,530 |
40 | Philip Volk | York, ND 58386 | $1,381,834 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”