Loan Deficiency in Bottineau County, North Dakota, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 1,666
Recipients of Loan Deficiency from farms in Bottineau County, North Dakota totaled $37,056,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Loan Deficiency 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Ballantyne Agri | Westhope, ND 58793 | $636,528 |
2 | Witteman Farms | Mohall, ND 58761 | $533,877 |
3 | Kersten Brothers | Newburg, ND 58762 | $377,508 |
4 | Drangsholt Farms Inc | Mohall, ND 58761 | $347,478 |
5 | Michael Lloyd Siercks | Souris, ND 58783 | $327,918 |
6 | Tonneson Brothers | Bottineau, ND 58318 | $283,204 |
7 | David Ernest Kyle | Bottineau, ND 58318 | $265,689 |
8 | Mr Duane Michael Hahn | Bottineau, ND 58318 | $259,813 |
9 | Dean Edward Feland | Antler, ND 58711 | $259,235 |
10 | Mark Glinz | Bottineau, ND 58318 | $257,754 |
11 | Todd & Carey Streich Partnership | Maxbass, ND 58760 | $256,799 |
12 | Tom Henry | Westhope, ND 58793 | $250,516 |
13 | Paul Mark Solberg | Bottineau, ND 58318 | $246,697 |
14 | Owen Glen Kornkven | Souris, ND 58783 | $235,841 |
15 | Issendorf Bros | Newburg, ND 58762 | $224,795 |
16 | Douglas S Trengen | Bottineau, ND 58318 | $224,259 |
17 | Brackelsberg Farms | Mohall, ND 58761 | $221,027 |
18 | Thomas Oliver Deschamp | Bottineau, ND 58318 | $218,452 |
19 | Larry Steven Neubauer | Bottineau, ND 58318 | $216,212 |
20 | Robert Kenneth Artz | Minot, ND 58701 | $210,182 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>