Farm Subsidy information
Bowman County, North Dakota
Total Subsidies in Bowman County, North Dakota, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 1,564
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Bowman County, North Dakota totaled $239,402,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Charles Berkley Bowman | Rhame, ND 58651 | $2,407,487 |
2 | Travis Justin Lambourn | Bowman, ND 58623 | $2,391,065 |
3 | Jeff Czywczynski | Scranton, ND 58653 | $2,309,307 |
4 | Duane Ralph Pierce | Scranton, ND 58653 | $2,213,585 |
5 | Nordak Llp | Audubon, IA 50025 | $2,181,685 |
6 | Mrnak Ranch Partnership | Bowman, ND 58623 | $2,079,414 |
7 | Donald Bruce Lambourn | Scranton, ND 58653 | $1,988,215 |
8 | Bruce Alvin Freitag | Scranton, ND 58653 | $1,796,682 |
9 | Mark Kelner | Reeder, ND 58649 | $1,738,020 |
10 | Robb Duane Pierce | Scranton, ND 58653 | $1,570,673 |
11 | Allen Thomas Fish | Rhame, ND 58651 | $1,493,516 |
12 | Monte Leland Freitag | Scranton, ND 58653 | $1,488,814 |
13 | Connie Jean Freitag | Scranton, ND 58653 | $1,449,972 |
14 | Neal D Freitag | Scranton, ND 58653 | $1,411,447 |
15 | Robert Earl Brewer | Bowman, ND 58623 | $1,397,524 |
16 | Kevin Symanowski | Reeder, ND 58649 | $1,391,117 |
17 | Wesley Andrews | Bowman, ND 58623 | $1,378,675 |
18 | Leo Heinrich | Bowman, ND 58623 | $1,356,565 |
19 | David M Niemi | Buffalo, SD 57720 | $1,329,332 |
20 | Jeffry Alan Brown | Scranton, ND 58653 | $1,318,172 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>