Loan Deficiency in Cass County, North Dakota, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 1,496
Recipients of Loan Deficiency from farms in Cass County, North Dakota totaled $86,111,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Loan Deficiency 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Duane/corinne Dickson Jtvt | Fargo, ND 58104 | $626,074 |
2 | Nelson Farm Enterprises Part | Amenia, ND 58004 | $593,017 |
3 | Glasow Farms Partnership | Davenport, ND 58021 | $592,948 |
4 | Williams Farms Part | Arthur, ND 58006 | $573,412 |
5 | Dalrymple Farms | Casselton, ND 58012 | $566,268 |
6 | Gebeke Brothers Part | Arthur, ND 58006 | $513,020 |
7 | John/margaret Rutten Jtvt | Mapleton, ND 58059 | $496,438 |
8 | Future Vision Partnership | Kathryn, ND 58049 | $478,697 |
9 | Sinner Bros & Bresnahan | Casselton, ND 58012 | $467,075 |
10 | Mitchell Farms Inc | Erie, ND 58029 | $436,479 |
11 | C & W Belter Farm Jt Vt | Leonard, ND 58052 | $423,833 |
12 | Daniel Lester Zimmerman | Amenia, ND 58004 | $422,497 |
13 | Mark Andrews Farm | Mapleton, ND 58059 | $396,997 |
14 | Giermann Partnership | Wheatland, ND 58079 | $396,574 |
15 | Bruce Edwin Hagen | Ayr, ND 58007 | $394,190 |
16 | Saewert Brothers Partnership | Davenport, ND 58021 | $390,551 |
17 | M And M Farms Partnership | Tower City, ND 58071 | $381,738 |
18 | Dirk Hansen | Hunter, ND 58048 | $376,321 |
19 | A & T Farms Part | Fargo, ND 58107 | $365,580 |
20 | Morrell Dickson Est | Galesburg, ND 58035 | $361,537 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>