Loan Deficiency in Eddy County, North Dakota, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 375
Recipients of Loan Deficiency from farms in Eddy County, North Dakota totaled $9,877,000 in from 1995-2021.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Loan Deficiency 1995-2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | T-t Ranch | Grace City, ND 58445 | $539,795 |
| 2 | Nancy Klein Est | Des Moines, WA 98198 | $301,239 |
| 3 | Harold Klein | Des Moines, WA 98198 | $293,087 |
| 4 | Bradley Weber | New Rockford, ND 58356 | $249,714 |
| 5 | Merle Henry Longnecker | New Rockford, ND 58356 | $190,401 |
| 6 | Larry John Lura | Carrington, ND 58421 | $174,956 |
| 7 | Phyllis B & Jay Topp | New Rockford, ND 58356 | $174,722 |
| 8 | Kenneth Allen Reis | New Rockford, ND 58356 | $173,361 |
| 9 | Bruce Kjelgaard | Mchenry, ND 58464 | $158,103 |
| 10 | Eric Longnecker | New Rockford, ND 58356 | $135,170 |
| 11 | Gordon Allan Benson | Sheyenne, ND 58374 | $126,196 |
| 12 | Stuart Richter | New Rockford, ND 58356 | $126,102 |
| 13 | Monty Joel Schaefer | Carrington, ND 58421 | $124,631 |
| 14 | Norman Birkeland | New Rockford, ND 58356 | $123,680 |
| 15 | Gary Gerard Geisinger | New Rockford, ND 58356 | $117,419 |
| 16 | Gary Lee Weigum | New Rockford, ND 58356 | $114,838 |
| 17 | Brandon James Ziebart | New Rockford, ND 58356 | $110,524 |
| 18 | Roger Eugene Benson | Sheyenne, ND 58374 | $103,933 |
| 19 | Columbia Farms Inc | Grace City, ND 58445 | $99,493 |
| 20 | Jacob Robert Engels | New Rockford, ND 58356 | $98,936 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf