Farm Subsidy information
Golden Valley County, North Dakota
Total Subsidies in Golden Valley County, North Dakota, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 1,004
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Golden Valley County, North Dakota totaled $164,538,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Bradley Matthew Maus | Golva, ND 58632 | $622,320 |
42 | Dan Schaal | Beach, ND 58621 | $615,569 |
43 | James L Fulton | Golva, ND 58632 | $613,938 |
44 | David C Davidson | Beach, ND 58621 | $612,572 |
45 | Smith Family Farm | Beach, ND 58621 | $603,921 |
46 | Arnold T Smith | Beach, ND 58621 | $600,180 |
47 | Brian Fischer | Golva, ND 58632 | $576,842 |
48 | David Michael Clarin | Sentinel Butte, ND 58654 | $574,523 |
49 | Gary Gregory Maus | Golva, ND 58632 | $566,744 |
50 | Clay Farstveet | Beach, ND 58621 | $565,672 |
51 | Gerald Streitz | Sentinel Butte, ND 58654 | $561,599 |
52 | Dale Edward Maus | Sentinel Butte, ND 58654 | $560,936 |
53 | Robert Mcdanold | Beach, ND 58621 | $530,757 |
54 | Joan R Smith | Beach, ND 58621 | $511,167 |
55 | Jay Dykins | Beach, ND 58621 | $510,668 |
56 | Noll Farms LLC | Golva, ND 58632 | $508,976 |
57 | Stephen W Kremers | Sentinel Butte, ND 58654 | $501,240 |
58 | Paul J Schmitz | Beach, ND 58621 | $492,574 |
59 | Gordon J Ueckert | Sentinel Butte, ND 58654 | $490,292 |
60 | John Simonson | Highmore, SD 57345 | $482,885 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”